Historical Reference

The Turkmen by Demetrius Charles Boulger
The Turkmen Part 8

Turkmen Part 1 - Turkmen Part 2 - Turkmen Part 3 - Turkmen Part 4 - Turkmen Part 5 - Turkmen Part 6 - The Turkmen Part 7 - Turkmen Part 8 - Turkmen Part 9 - Turkmen Part 10 - Turkmen Part 11 - Turkmen Part 12

Without following this subject at greater length at the present moment, it will be instructive to remember that both England and Russia are bound by treaty to respect the integrity of Persia; and that technically, and now actually, the Teke country as far as Merv is a portion of the province of Khorasan. This is no new claim invented yesterday, but one of established historical veracity; and the southern Turkmen — the Tekes more especially — are Persian subjects by position and association. The question then arises, Are not the guaranteeing Powers restrained against any aggressive act against these Persian subjects by the terms of the treaty? Is it compatible with past stipulations that fresh conquests should be snatched from the Tekes, who are now de facto subjects of the Shah? These are very important questions, which require an authoritative answer. Hitherto our Foreign Secretaries have raised objections to Russia's movements in Kara Kum, because they threatened the integrity of Merv, a question of vital importance to this country; but now it appears that these same operations are directed against Persian territory and subjects, both of which the St. Petersburg Government is bound to respect. Nor is this view of the Turkmen being Persian subjects far-fetched, for such they are by all practical ties, and in that fact the only hope for a continuance of their independence remains. Whatever doubt, too, there may be of the whole Teke country having become an integral part of the Persian dominions, there can be no question of the town of Sarakhs having become so, and of all places, before the capture of Merv, and Sarakhs is the most important in this region. Therefore a Russian advance on Sarakhs would certainly be an infringement of Persian territory, and, as a strict matter of fact, any move beyond the Akhal fort at Anef would be in the same category, and should be firmly resisted with all the diplomatic force at our disposal. If persisted in, it should be held to be a hostile act, and as such to be met. The importance of Sarakhs, on the high road from Meshed to Merv, Charjui, and Bokhara, is, as Sir Henry Rawlinson has said, that it is only by it that an advance could be made on Merv from the west. There is no information of any road existing from Abuverd through the Tejend swamp to Merv, and consequently an army coming from Kizil Arvat would have to occupy Sarakhs in the first place.

The arrangement between the Tekes and the Shah has therefore been so far pregnant with beneficial results, that it has pushed Persian territory forward so as to intervene between the Russian forces north of the Attock and the oasis of Merv. An opportunity is thus afforded this country of achieving a very material advantage by strengthening the ties which have been established between the Persians and the Turkmen. By extending the Persian frontier up to the old limits of Khorasan, that is to say, by including the country from Ashkhabad to Merv, and by enforcing existing treaties, we can erect in the path of Lomakine an obstacle which he dare not encounter unless he be prepared to undertake that great war which, however inevitable in the end, Russia is at present so unfit to wage. The view that has just been taken of this transaction is, we believe, the most probable one, but we must not ignore the Machiavellian designs which are by some considered to be at the root of this proceeding.

The first view is that Persia has been acting throughout in collusion with Russia, and that the Turkmen have taken service under the Shah in order to share in some great enterprise in Western Afghanistan. Bribery has made the Turkmen complacent, and the promise of Herat has won over the Shah. Of this tripartite arrangement none of the parties would obtain any permanent benefit save Russia, and it would be wronging the astuteness of the Persian, or even of the Turkmen, to suppose that they are so shallow as not to perceive this as clearly as we do.

The second view is that although Russia had nothing to do with the negotiations between Persia and the Tekes, yet, now that they have been consummated, she has striven, and, according to these, successfully, to turn the result to her personal advantage. According to this view there is the same tripartite arrangement, made for the same ends and between the same parties.

Both these views are fanciful, and give Russia a credit for superhuman astuteness to which she is by no means entitled. The probable state of the case is that Persia, without being downright hostile, is watchful and suspicious of Russia's designs — perhaps also nervous at the progress of events on the Atrek and round Kizil Arvat ; that the Turkmen are fairly alarmed at the danger of their position, and anxiously regarding the attitude of both Persia and this country and it is just possible that, in the event of the former refusing to perform its duties, and of the latter remaining passive, they may throw up the sponge and come to terms with Lomakine. The Russians themselves are hampered by some of the doubts that must beset them when on the point of attempting another great enterprise in Central Asia. In the meanwhile they are gathering their strength to a point, so that when the blow has to be struck it may be dealt rapidly and without hesitation. On the action of Persia the whole affair depends. The Shah can inspire the Turkmen with the necessary courage, and he can provide them with most of their wants. He can, by withholding supplies, and by giving carte blanche to the Kurd borderers, seriously delay the march of a Russian army beyond Kizil Arvat. But of his intention to play this bold part there is no evidence. His strict neutrality is probably the most the Tekes can count upon.

One of the principal reasons for regarding the Turkmen as among the best material for cavalry in the world is that they possess an abundant supply of the most excellent horses. They are mounted men at the present moment, and as riders have few equals and no superiors. In the tactics pursued by irregular cavalry they are already adepts, and little would be left to be done by the drill-sergeant. The weak point and for irregular warfare it is their only weak point is their weapons. Their most desperate onset — and those who have seen a Turkmen charge say that it is delivered in the most admirable manner — breaks before the volleys of rapidly-repeating rifles which deal destruction into their ranks hundreds of yards before their own wretched weapons can have any effect.

They have striven, not always with ill-success, to make up for this inferiority by having recourse to stratagem, and by selecting the night-time as the season for their attack. But for the purposes of defensive warfare, such as the defense of Merv, they are unfortunately without the necessary means. They have no artillery, and their own personal weapons are antiquated and useless for modern warfare. Their valor and the excellence of their horses can only very imperfectly supply those wants. But the good qualities of the Turkmen horses undoubtedly facilitate the task of converting these tribes into the most formidable mounted force in Central Asia.

The Turkmen horse is not less an object of affection to his master than the Arab is to his. When it has been decided to carry out a raid into Persia, the Turkmen puts his horse through a regular course of training, of which the following is a description. For thirty days before the time appointed for the start the animal is exercised daily, part of that exercise being to gallop at full speed for half an hour. Some hours after he is brought in he is fed, his food consisting of six pounds of hay, or clover-hay, and about three pounds of barley or one-half the usual allowance of corn. During this period as little water as possible is given to the horse. Sometimes this period is shorter than the time specified, particularly if the animal appears to be in the necessary hard condition. But the preparatory course of training does not stop here, although the start for the scene of the proposed foray, or chapaoul, is then made. Each Turkmen takes with him an inferior horse called yaboo, which he himself rides until he reaches the place of action. It then serves to carry back the plunder. The charger, as it may be termed, follows bare-backed and without bridle his master, and the advance is graduated so that the daily march shall not be excessive. During this later stage, which lasts from the time of starting until the arrival at the scene where it is proposed to assail the Persian village, the horse's food is changed to four pounds and a quarter of barley flour, two pounds of maize flour, and two pounds of raw sheep's-tail fat chopped very fine. These are well mixed and kneaded together, and given to the horse in the form of a ball.

Turkmen Part 1 - Turkmen Part 2 - Turkmen Part 3 - Turkmen Part 4 - Turkmen Part 5 - Turkmen Part 6 - Turkmen Part 7 - Turkmen Part 8 - Turkmen Part 9 - Turkmen Part 10 - Turkmen Part 11 - Turkmen Part 12

England and Russia in Central Asia by Demetrius Charles Boulger, Demetrius Charles de Kavanagh Boulger

London, W.H.Allen & Co., 1879 8vo. 2 vols.

As seen on: http://books.google.com/books?id=cKABAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA223&dq=teke+salor#PPA221,M1

A special note this is drawn from Boulger's England and Russia in Central Asia. I have taken to edit it and standardize spelling. For instance Boulger mentioned two spellings Turkmen or Turcomans and proceeded to use Turcomans. I elected to change it to Turkmen since it is the more correct usage today. If this bothers you please read some other version since I am doing this or me rather than for you.